In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples.
Recently, In underdeveloped countries, tourism has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the tourism industry is highly beneficial for under-developed countries, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, tourist destinations are bound up inextricably with employment opportunities for local people, which indicates they lead to both creating jobs and generating income. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between tourist centres and economic growth as well as an exponential increase in tax revenues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of financial success is correlated positively with not only holiday-makers but also foreign tourists.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, tourism attributes to exchanging cultural backgrounds, in that it would come down to cultural diversity, understanding, and global awareness. A salient example of such attribution is traditional customs, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a rich cultural heritage for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint social problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to moral and religious values. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of tourist attractions.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analysing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of tourism in less developed countries are of more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 77 | view |
- Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- Study needs time, peace and comfort, whereas employment needs the same thing. Someone says it is impossible to combine those two because one distracts one another. Do you think this is realistic in our lives today? 62
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 85
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analysing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87162162162 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37261670849 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685810810811 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5668798831 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098295556174 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265903927195 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394293374917 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625756819058 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506096404003 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 55.0591133005 225% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.