The university deduct the student's score for late assignments, opinions and solutions.

Essay topics:

The university deduct the student's score for late assignments, opinions and solutions.

Recently, the phenomenon of the university assignments and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the university degree is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that homework assignments can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the student's score can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the general score, as well as the average score, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered assessing systems. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both low scores and high scores apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the education system might increase the consequences of improving knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the necessary information could relate to this reality that demerits of the natural talent pertain to theoretical knowledge. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of training methods is correlated negatively with the learning environment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning facilities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting the score of the late assignments far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of classroom activities prove the significance of the presentation, but also pinpoint brilliant students implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69230769231 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26768289148 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0933353493 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183295842366 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519872953188 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04727798786 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949916280194 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612419358079 0.0609392437508 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.