The reading and the lecture are both about the existence of the remains of the T. rex's actual tissues on its discovered fossils. While the author of the reading argues that there are some materials inside the T. rex's leg bone that seem to be remnants of the animal tissues such as blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen, the professor disputes this claim. He states that he is skeptical about the whole idea. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading passage by providing three controversial reasons.
In the reading, the writer begins by saying that the bone contains some small holes, which are probably the location of blood vessels. Also, these hollow parts include soft and flexible organic substances, which are the indicator of the blood vessels of T. rex. However, the professor disagrees with this idea. He asserts that this soft substance has nothing to do with the blood vessels and it is the result of something else. He claims that it is more probable that the bacteria colonized these hollow parts and they left behind this soft and organic material.
Furthermore, according to the reading microscopic examinations of the different parts of that bone shows the existence of spheres that are the size of the red blood cells, and they could be the remains of red blood cells. On the other hand, the professor points out that scientists have found these spheres in the fossils of other animals in that region; even the primitive animals, which did not have red blood cells. He believes that these spheres originated from a different source, maybe another reddish material.
Finally, the author believes that the discovered bone contains collagen that belongs to T. rex. Not surprisingly, the lecturer refutes this assertion by contending that collagen can not last more than one hundred thousand years. He says that this collagen may come from another origin, for example, the skin of the researchers holding the bones.
To sum up, both the author and the lecturer hold conflicting views on the existence of T. rex's tissues in its fossils.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 73
- TPO 47 Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs w 70
- Nowadays people are busy with many things If you were given a short period of time what would you choose 1 learn to play a new sport you never played 2 learn to cook food in a different way 3 learn to do some hand made work like clothes 76
- When a new technological device becomes available Some people buy it right away while others will wait until many have acquired it Which do you prefer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76