The passage and the lecture discuss the method in which employees work 4 days in a week instead of 5 days. The author supports this idea and mentions 3 reasons. On the other hand, the points made by the speaker is in direct contrast to the ones outlined in the passage. The lecturer refutes all 3 supporting reasons for 4-day work framework.
First, the lecturer refutes the point made by the author by clarifying that 4-day-work approach does not necessarily cost reducing. In fact, he claims this approach increases costs dramatically because the company will become obliged to spend more on medi...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: farzaneh
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Integrated WritingPrivate collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, 80
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 58
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that rece 93
- Integrated WritingIn the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies t 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The decision that people make quickly are always wrong. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 90
Sentence: Finally, the lecturer claims that 4-day-work approach is not benefitial to individuals.
Error: benefitial Suggestion: beneficial
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 268 250
No. of Characters: 1311 1200
No. of Different Words: 147 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.046 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.892 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.324 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.588 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.362 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.57 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4