It is better to be a member of a group that to be a leader of a group

Some people think that it is better to be a member that to be a leader of a group; other believe that being a leader of a group is better.Taking in consideration my leadership abilities I personally believe that it is better to be a leader.

First of all, being a leader you have more power- the power of taking the final decisions. As a simple member of the group you can make suggestions but that doesn't mean that they will be approved. The final decision is always made by the leader because he has the responsibility for everything he sings. A good leader will always take in consideration the suggestions of the group members and using his power of decision he will do what is the best for the whole group.

Second, we should not oversee that with this great power comes the responsibility. Any leader that enjoy having this power knows that he has a big responsibility for his actions. For instance a football couch has to be very careful with all of his decision because his orders would affect the end of the game: winning or losing!
Last but not at least, as the responsibility comes with power, the earnings comes with the responsibility. Every good decision, action of a leader are bringing him satisfactions beyond money, it bring him the respect of the groups members that is worth more than anything.

In conclusion I would say that every position has his advantages and disadvantages, however as I have mentioned in the above arguments it can be seen that the leader has a more important position so I would say that it is definitely better to be a leader.