The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1
The line graph and table illustrate the different water usage in three sectors by the world population for the 1900-2000 period and in two specific countries in 2000.
The first impression is that Agriculture accounts for the highest amount at all times and there is an increasing tendency throughout the years in three groups of users. Regarding the two nations mentioned, Brazil unarguably outperforms Congo in all aspects not just water consumption.
In particular, it can be observed from the graph that the global water use in the Agriculture area witnessed a consistent yet subtle improvement in the 1900-1940 phase before rising dramatically from 1940 at 750 km3 to 3000 km3 in 2000. While a similar trend was shared by the other sectors during 1900-1950, Industrial factories and companies used much more water than households did since 1950. These two both started at 0 km3 in 1900 and ended up at 1250 km3 and 500 km3 in 2000 respectively.
On the other hand, Brazil consumed more than 44 times the water amount used by Congo. This can be related to the distinguishing gap between two nations in total population and square kilometers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...km3 in 1900 and ended up at 1250 km3 and 500 km3 in 2000 respectively. On the o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, while, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02604166667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81234085198 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630208333333 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5832587954 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18826874656 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825639803546 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639788106676 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122065623393 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576958617266 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.