Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17-t-p6s5s46S8dOZLf9oRCx1mpNd7IhA/view?…
The bar chart depicts statistics on fast foods expenditure of 3 different groups of income in 1990.
Overall, hamburger, fish and chips, pizza are spent differently among the 3 groups of people living in the UK. The high income group has the biggest amount of money spent on fast foods, and the low income group, in contrast, has the smallest amount.
Hamburger was the most preferred fast food among the high and average income people, with around 42% and 32% people spending on it, respectively. Slightly more than 15% people with high income spent on fish and chips, a little less than the number of people from this group charging for pizza, which was about 18%. By contrast, the percentage of expenditure on fish and chips outweighted that of money spent on pizza, which was exactly 25% and slightly more than 10%, respectively.
Having much moderate number than those 2 groups above, the low income people spent their money on fish and chips with the highest amount, which was around 22%. Unlikely the high and average income groups, the figure for hamburger only ranked as the second-highest among this group, which was almost 15%. Pizza was the least preferred fast food, with only more than 5% people with low income chage for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...he bar chart depicts statistics on fast foods expenditure of 3 different groups of in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86384976526 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33277120783 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483568075117 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6606534563 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0160800941212 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00872510400272 0.103423049105 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0124415046938 0.0843802449381 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00935815115589 0.15604864568 6% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104723028094 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.