TPO 41
Concerns about having more strict regulations for companies who deal with a dangerous waste material, coal ash, are increasing. Environmentalists are totally insisting on more regulations while power companies are disagreed with.
First, as a concrete reason for power companies, they point out that the regulations exist already while environmentalists assert that the existed regulations do not cover all the aspects of the harmfulness of coal ash. For example, companies are obliged to use the liner in the ponds and landfills they will build, but the existed ponds or landfills are not included in the regulations. Therefore, old ponds and landfills are likely contaminating soil and ground waters now. So there is a huge need for new regulations.
Second, companies are worried about the recycled material based on coal ash. They claim if the regulations about the coal ash increase, people would stop using these kinds of products because consumers think the products are too dangerous. However, Environmentalists contend that Mercury, as an example of a waste material which is recycled for 50 years, has the same situation. The use of Mercury-recycled products hasn't declined and thus, this will happens for the products based on coal ash recycled.
Third, environmentalists are agreed that the costs of companies would increase dramatically but they also think that it worth a lot. In the case of power companies, the cost of electricity would increase just one percent and it is not a big price. It is worth to pay this cost to have a more healthy environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...n. The use of Mercury-recycled products hasnt declined and thus, this will happens fo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
...ucts hasnt declined and thus, this will happens for the products based on coal ash recy...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22047244094 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13249287709 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2676458778 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.551951370477 0.272083759551 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178635544005 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105207443694 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29738186679 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102259858612 0.0443174109184 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.