The prompt argues that no field can make significant progress if we do not apply the principles and experiences from the other fields. I agree with the prompt that in order to enhance particular study courses, knowledge about other field would be helpful, but it may not be applied to all fields.
The incorporation of idea and experience of the other fields can be seen patently in our modern world. When we consider about technical courses, we can see that the courses have altered their curriculum from the past decade. Courses like pharmacy, geology are not only becoming advanced day by day but also incorporation of other subjects can be seen in these courses. For instances, in order to understand, in pharmacy subjects, how the medicine are made deep understanding various chemical reactions, forces involved during the reactions. Similarly, in geology, since the carbon dating facilitate to determine the age of the planet or a rock, it include radio-activity subject in their curriculum. Inclusion of the external factors is helping to shape the courses in the more definite way.
The incorporation of the other fields helps, in certain cases, to solve the dilemma. These external factors helps researcher to approach the problem from different angle. For example, in order to achieve various causal factors that determine the flow of blood, understanding only of human body is not sufficient. The viscosity (subject of fluid dynamics) is also need to be considered. Also, we can see, in modern days, use computer programming to enhance the knowledge about the fields. Computer based simulation provides environmentalist to know more about the global-warming effect prior to occurrence of real situation, or helps geologist to know about the structure of earth, when it is was first formed.
However, the incorporation of outside field facilitates in progress, but it is not that the incorporation is mandatory for advancement. We can see that the literature, being advanced, is not the result of incorporation. Instead, advancement is due to radical thought of literati. Furthermore, mathematics is also pristine.
In conclusion, due to the above mentioned reason I do not fully agree with the prompt. Incorporation may help to advance in certain courses, but there are also the courses, being advanced, immaculate from the interference of outside field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'includes'?
Suggestion: includes
...ine the age of the planet or a rock, it include radio-activity subject in their curricu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...osity subject of fluid dynamics is also need to be considered. Also, we can see, in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 688, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...w about the structure of earth, when it is was first formed. However, the incor...
^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...bout the structure of earth, when it is was first formed. However, the incorpora...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermore, mathematics is also pristine. In conclusion, due to the above mentione...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, similarly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29100529101 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0661181642 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0348695827 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216823424271 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615656967171 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673896943488 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131347276639 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566377251614 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.