The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the value of fuel, food, manufactured goods and the total value of exports in one country from 2000 to 2005. The x-axis illustrates the years from 2000 to 2005 whereas Y-axis describes the value of exports in million dollars. In overall, the manufactured goods have shown the incremental trends from 2000 to 2005 and food market also shows the steady trends. Whereas for fuel exports show that it is declining trends.
From the graph based on the value of fuel exports demonstrates that the fuel has made of its exports of 300,000 million dollars in 2000. This figure has slightly failed from 2001 to 2002 to reach its exports to 270,000 million dollars and 250,000 million dollars respectively. However, from 2002, drought point of fuel export has bounced back to 350,000 million dollars in 2003 and the exports of fuels steadily up to reach over 400,000 million dollars by 2005.
A value of fuel exports is not the best exports for this country, when it compared to the value of exporting foods and manufactured goods. The exports of food are almost same for all years, every year below 10,000 million dollars. The exports of fuel, on the other hand, has reached at well over 40,000 million dollars in 2000 and dropped to slight below 40,000 million dollars by 2001. This figure continues to fell to reach of 20,000 million dollars by 2005. Surprisingly, the exports of manufactured goods have shown the steady but slowly growing trends from 2000 to 2001. The value of manufactur4ed goods had exported at below 20,000 million dollars in 2000 and made a short jump to over 20,000 million dollars in 2001. This value remained same in 2002 and there is a slightly drop in 2003 to reach at 20,000 million dollars. The manufactured goods have bounced up to the slightly over 20,000 million dollars in 2004 and this has up again by little bit from the previous value but still above 20,000 million dollars in 2005.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-02-04 | xenocide | 88 | view |
2015-08-25 | YS89 | 80 | view |
2015-02-03 | keerthisri | 50 | view |
2014-06-15 | drjowelynt | 60 | view |
- The bar graph compares the amount of coffee and meat consumed each year by Norway, France, Germany, USA, Russia, China and Japan. 70
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 58
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 70
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 70
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make com 60
it is declining trends.
it is in declining trends.
it has declining trends.
flaws:
No. of Words: 334 200
Write the essay in 20 minutes. Don't need content like: 'The x-axis illustrates the years from 2000 to 2005 whereas Y-axis describes the value of exports in million dollars.'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 10
No. of Words: 334 200
No. of Characters: 1566 1000
No. of Different Words: 123 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.275 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.689 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.293 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.475 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.467 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.475 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.587 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.197 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4