The chart gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. According to the chart we seeing in 1990 people who have 18-35 age had given money to charity was approximately 20 %. That's much more than in 2010. The statistics of 2010 was 5%. The people who on age group 26-35 had given money to charity was 30% in 1990. But the showings of 2010this number is 25%. In the chart we seeing also age group 36-50, people who on this age group had given money to charity was 45%. In the 2010 this is 35%.
Following to the chart we seeing age group 51-65 and this age group had given money to charity was 35% in 1990. In 2010 this statistics is 40%. And last age group people who older than 65 had given money to charity was approximately 35%. But in 2010 this number is 35%.
At the overall we had analyzed this chart. We saw that how to changed percentage between years 1990 and 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...oney to charity was approximately 20 %. Thats much more than in 2010. The statistics ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ney to charity was 35% in 1990. In 2010 this statistics is 40%. And last age group ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is statistics is 40%. And last age group people who older than 65 had given money...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27222222222 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12289897067 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1552863819 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 54.9285714286 112.824112599 49% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8571428571 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419191811849 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172997895312 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224017519989 0.0843802449381 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28239630031 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147230070593 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.1 13.2329268293 39% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.14 61.2550243902 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.3 10.3012195122 32% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.6 11.4140731707 58% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.46 8.06136585366 68% => OK
difficult_words: 14.0 40.7170731707 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.