The two figures compare the changes of City park’s layout, prior to and following construction of a swimming pool. Despite the apparently significant changes, the park retained the basic elements of basketball court, parking space and green area, with the addition of this swimming pool.
As can be seen on the figure 1, City park was a rectangular area with access from Park Road on the south side. There was a parking lot with eight spots in the south east corner with a separate small entrance. Two basketball courts, 1 and 2, stood side-by-side at park’s northwest side and next to the parking lot. Another parking lot with eight spots was located to the right of Park Road, occupying the southeast corner. A small entrance to the north side of this lot led to a fountain, situated in the south side of a largeish garden.
City park considerably altered after a swimming pool was built. The same Parking lot Road remained on the south west side; similarly, basketball court 1 stayed at the park’s northwest corner. Basketball court 2 was gone and in its places was the second parking lot with six spots and a new entrance from Park Road. Where the old parking lot stood was a big swimming pool, which enlarged the previous area by sacrificing the fountain. As a result, although the garden stayed in the same location, its size shrunk without the fountain.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, second, similarly, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78481012658 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55016433593 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9761165885 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199567374475 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103346965596 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792199555129 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163375614284 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044920643238 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.