The supplied graph delineates estimated proportions of energy usage and manufacture in units during the period between 1950 and 2000 in the US. Likewise, it illustrates projections for the next 25 years.
The first glance at this line graph reveals that there is an overall growth in both trends but the U.S. consumption of energy always surpasses its production with a gradually growing difference in units. The most striking detail is that energy usage will peak at approximately 145 energy units by 2025 whereas manufacturing will reach only around 80 units by the same year what is almost twice as less as energy consumption.
Another conspicuous feature is that chart's main trends have swung fractionally. Having considered all fluctuations, two moments with the most insignificant difference in energy units for both making and using were disclosed. It happened in 1950 when the number of units was equal to 25 or 30 and a few years before 1975 with the same width at the level of 50 energy units.
Summarizing and taking all figures that the line graph indicates into account, it can be evident that dynamic is upward with some oscillations leading either to the large or nonessential difference between two main trends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... same year what is almost twice as less as energy consumption. Another conspicu...
^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n energy units for both making and using were disclosed. It happened in 1950 when...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09359605911 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82211413319 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635467980296 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2903787734 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190760978188 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788476844954 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253277815866 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110518357908 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295314580121 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.