The given line graph indicates the information on the number of tourists paying a visit to Caribbean island over the period of 7 years.
Overall, the number of people visit the island in total ranks highest over the period shown. It is noticeable that this figure significantly increase from 2010 to 2017, while there are fluctuations in number of visitors choosing to stay on cruise ships and on island.
As we can see from the graph, in 2010, there are 1 million people came to Caribbean island, this number considerably climbed by 2.65 million in 2015 and stayed unchanged within a year. Between 2016 and 2017, Caribbean saw an enormous rise in the number of tourists, with 3.5 million of visitors in 2017, Caribbean island became a tourist trap.
Turning to the other sectors, in the year 2010, the number of people visited Caribbean by cruise ships is pretty low, at only 0.3 million, compared to the figure on people staying on island in that year, 0.7 million. In the next 5 years, the number on these sectors differently considerably fluctuated until the time between 2015 and 2016, the number of cruise ships visitors surpassed the one of island staying tourist and still continued to increase significantly by 2 million in 2017, while only 1.5 million of tourists stayed on the island in the same year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'ranks the highest'.
Suggestion: ranks the highest
...ber of people visit the island in total ranks highest over the period shown. It is noticeable...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83185840708 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54398228703 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.9042403025 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2857142857 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265348143644 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15495443068 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549460539433 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199392751511 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418492449266 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.