The line graph illustrates the information how much visitor per month visits British museum, science museum, natural history museum in London from June to September 2013.
Overall, British museum was most popular among other London museum, it popularity fluctuated over that period. Science museum was less popular but it popularity increased in June to September. In the case of natural history museum number of visitors was decreased.
British museum was attract highest visitor all the time, In June almost 600,000 visitor visit British museum, number of visitor went up until July and it raised almost 750,000 but suddenly number of visitor dropped almost 250,000 from the peck point. Between august and September number of visitor climbed 500000 to approximately 650000.
Science museum always less popular to visitor, 400,000 visitor attend science museum in June then number of visitor slumped until august, then sudden increased number of visitor in September (almost 450000). On the other hand, natural history museum was second popular museum in June but its popularity declined in July, then remains stable up to august and finally number of visitor increased in September but overall visitor was dropped 100,000 for its starting point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'attracted'.
Suggestion: attracted
...rs was decreased. British museum was attract highest visitor all the time, In June a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'attract the highest'.
Suggestion: attract the highest
...rs was decreased. British museum was attract highest visitor all the time, In June almost 60...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, second, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4793814433 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3095832365 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474226804124 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.898795429 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.875 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250271522398 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140256380914 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690016704307 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187193760289 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681017061642 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.