The pie chart illustrates the effects of over-grazing, over-cultivation, deforestation and other causes of farmland infertility while the table represent these adverse outcome in North America Europe and Oceania in the 1990's.
Overall, the highest cost of land spoilage is over-grazing followed by deforestation, whereas the greatest land assault occurred in European continent accounting for almost double than other continental together. Interestingly, there was no over-grazing in Oceania.
Throughout the world, excessive animal rearing has greatly impacted land destruction by 35%. This is closely accompanied by tree cutting practices which unfortunately resulted in soil degradation (30%) and continuous cultivation habits accounted for 28% while other practices destroyed the land by 7% this is considerably lower than other causes
Regionally, Europe suffered the greatest land assault ranging from deforestation being the chief amongst them (9.8%), then land overuse which detoriated the soil components took second place (7.7%) and overgrazing was 5.5% totalling an alarming rate of 23%. Oceania land degradation was totalled 13%. Notably, they did not suffer from over cultivation as they practiced Bush Fallow system. Lastly North America escaped land ruin as they had a summary of 5%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, second, so, then, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88888888889 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13137231376 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68253968254 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 146.364218219 43.030603864 340% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.125 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0856670637834 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376645970463 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028770383741 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550543255915 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242641149009 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 61.2550243902 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.06136585366 129% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.