The pie chart shows the main 4 reasons which causes degradation of land worldwide. The bar graph illustrates how these factors affected North America, Europe and Oceania during the 1990s.
Overall, it can be seen that overgrazing and deforestation causes the majority of land degradation worldwide. Also we can see that Europe was the most affected region during the period.
To begin with, it can be seen that around 35% of worldwide land degradation is caused by over-grazing. Around 58% of land degradation is caused by deforestation and over-cultivation. Salinatoon accounted for only about 8 percent of the total land degradation.
Secondly, in 1990s Europe withnessed the biggest land degradation of about 22%, in which deforestation contributed the most(8.4%).In Oceania around 10.8% of land was lost due to over-grazing. Deforestation and over-cultivation contributed the least around 2%. North America had the lowest figures in which around 6% of land was lost by deforestation and over-cultivation. Only 1.5% of land was lost through over-grazing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...majority of land degradation worldwide. Also we can see that Europe was the most aff...
^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...e total land degradation. Secondly, in 1990s Europe withnessed the biggest land degr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... deforestation contributed the most8.4%.In Oceania around 10.8% of land was lost d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53374233129 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46984449851 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1570267361 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8181818182 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167990063841 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801947026415 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888942147614 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139142154122 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118698490268 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.2 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.