The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.

Given table and pie charts illustrates, the cost and contribution proprtion of different countries in fish import to U S respectively, from 1988 to 2000.
At first a glance, it is clearly visible that the cost of import increased throughout the period, besides Canda lost it's proportion in a high margin.
Firstly, in 1988 the total expence to us in fish importing was 6.57 billion in which Canada contributed more than half where as the China accounted 13% and 27% Other countries respectively.
Moving next to 1992 witnessed a dramatic fall in sales of Canada, to 34% on the other hand China gained 7%. Other countries experienced a jump in sales to 46%, holding major market share in that period. At the end, in 2000, Canada showed a further decrease in export , at the same time China grew exponentially reaching 30%. Other countries underwent a minimal reduction of 4%, but holded about half of the total sale.
Overall, total sale increased throughout the period while Canada showed a decreasing trend, both Other countries and China gained much than earlier.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...which Canada contributed more than half where as the China accounted 13% and 27% Other c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ext to 1992 witnessed a dramatic fall in sales of Canada, to 34% on the other han...
^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nada showed a further decrease in export , at the same time China grew exponential...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t holded about half of the total sale. Overall, total sale increased throughout...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... while Canada showed a decreasing trend, both Other countries and China gained mu...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97206703911 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73881564022 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642458100559 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4841229829 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176336007467 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792584743822 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944509286298 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112278274997 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101866434927 0.0819641961636 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.