The given pie charts show the total of electricity production measured by unit and divided by different sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the amount of electricity produced in both countries rised up over that period. While most of energy was from coal in Australia, nuclear power was the vital fuel source of France in 2000.
According to the chart, 100 units of electricity was generated in 1980 in Australia, half of which was contributed by coal. Natural gas and hidro power accounted for the same ratio, at 20 percents, double the propotion of oil. In 2000, the total was increased to 170 units, and the percentage of coal was much higher ( 130 out of 170). Meanwhile, the use of hidro power increased to 36, but oil and natural gas was reduced rapidly in 2000, with only 2 percents.
Turning to the fuel sources in France, the units of electricity produced in 2000 doubled that in 1980 ( 180 compare to 90). Coal, oil and gas occupied approximately the same proportion in total ( at 25 and 20) in 1980, while nuclear power account for 15 percents and hidro power at 5 percents. However, in 2000, nuclear power took up the largest propotion, at 126, then coal and oil, finally are natural gas and hidro power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the percentage of coal was much higher 130 out of 170. Meanwhile, the use of hi...
^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty produced in 2000 doubled that in 1980 180 compare to 90. Coal, oil and gas occ...
^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compare' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
...duced in 2000 doubled that in 1980 180 compare to 90. Coal, oil and gas occupied appro...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proximately the same proportion in total at 25 and 20 in 1980, while nuclear powe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67431192661 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52907093907 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5778652667 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.9 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203075896337 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105335979765 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12249948372 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182506501091 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132148857909 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.