The pie charts reveal information about electricity units produced by different energy sources in Australia and France in the years 1980 and 2000.
Overall, production capacity in Australia and France increased to almost twice in 2000 compared to 1980. The coal used as the main source in Australia both years, while in France, Nuclear power acted as a main source to produce electricity in 2000.
In Australia, Coal played the leading role and half of the units produced with it in 1980, which dramatically increased to 130 units in the next two decades. Furthermore, the same number of units produced by Natural Gas and Hypropower in 1980, which constituted 20 units each, which was double of Oil in the same year. The scenario got to change and only 4 units made with the help of Oil and Natural Gas, while the dependency on Hydro Power and produced an additional 16 units compared to 1980. Surprisingly, Nuclear power was not used in Australia to generate electricity.
On the other hand, in France, only 15 units produced by Nuclear power in 1980, which drastically increased to 126 units in 2000 and became the main source to generate power. In contrast, almost quarter units produced by Natural Gas in 1980, decreased to only 2 units in 2000. During 1980, 50 units manufactured by Coal with 25, hydro Power with 5 and Oil with 20 units, while in 2000, this proportion got slightly changed, with 25, 2, and 25 units, respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85425101215 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65619135022 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465587044534 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4069760368 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.9 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259148506067 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135482853638 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914105433646 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222866629314 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977821178608 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.