The given diagram describes the process of producing two types of Pu-erh: raw tea and ripe tea.
Looking from overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the processes for two varieties of tea in Pu-erh have the same initial stages such as frying, rolling and drying.
It is clear from the finished products that the first three stages of the production of both teas are similar. The leaves of tea trees are rolled after a process of being fried in a large skillet. The tea leaves are then spread evenly on a large patch to ensure drying under the sun. The final result we get is the loose raw tea.
After completing these three common steps, the loose raw tea has to go through two different processes including 3 steps, which create the two teas’ flavors. With a reference to fermented tea, first the raw tea is compressed. This is followed by aging by storage and then the PU-erh raw tea become available for use. Regarding the other phase, the loose raw tea is fermented by mold to produce loose ripe tea. After the fermenting process is complete, the loose ripe tea is compressed to form the final product - the Pu-erh ripe tea, which is ready for sale.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'tree'.
Suggestion: tree
...oth teas are similar. The leaves of tea trees are rolled after a process of being fri...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e patch to ensure drying under the sun. The final result we get is the loose raw te...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, then, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31634300791 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1244157251 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513307135542 0.215688989381 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245789278779 0.103423049105 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106752561287 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339712410966 0.15604864568 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138455841131 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.