The table provides information about the number of Ashdown Museum visitors before and after the refurbishment process. Meanwhile, the pie charts compare visitors’ satisfaction during the periods. From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the figure for the visitor after the museum was renovated increased significantly, and the satisfaction of visitors also showed a significant rise.
Looking for the table, before the renovation process took place, as many as 74.000 people had visited the museum, and then after the process was done, the number of Ashdown Museum visitors increased by 22.000 people.
Moving to the graphs, about 45% in total of the museum visitors felt satisfied and very satisfied, and the figure then showed an exponential increase to 75% in the latter year after the refurbishment process was done. Furthermore, another significant change was also seen in the number of dissatisfied visitors with almost a third of Ashdown Museum visitors feeling dissatisfied before the renovation of the museum compared to 15% of people who voiced out a similar opinion. The rest categories (very dissatisfied and no response) were accounted for a minority in both periods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4385026738 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93669079426 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3038069778 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.285714286 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362232847548 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173054034007 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710931386796 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251596588732 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693661583117 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.