The table compares the frequency of Ashdown Museum in two typical years, before and after its refurbishment, while the pie charts give data on findings of research about the feeling of guests throughout these two years.
Overall, it is noticeable that the museum became more attractive than before its refurbishment and received more positive comments as well.
In the year before the redecoration, exactly half of people visiting Ashdown Museum felt malcontent; in detail, 40 percent of them expressed their disappointment and one out of ten people even felt extremely dissatisfied. However, only one-third of visitors found this museum brought them the satisfactory. The number of visitors absolutely persuaded accounted for half of the figure for content visitors.
After renewed, the number of visitors to the museum increased from 74000 to 92000 turns. Moreover, the percentage of positive feedback rose to 75 percent of the total. There was 35 percent of guests who were totally enjoyable in the museum, while the figure for content guests also went up by ten percent to reach at 40 percent. In contrast, only 20 percent of people were not convinced (15 percent of malcontent visitors compared with five percent of people having gotten completely bad experience in the museum). In addition, the proportion of “no comment” answers still remained at five percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...the pie charts give date on findings of a research about feeling of guests throughout thes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, third, well, while, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34677419355 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97993419464 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568548387097 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6526689652 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.545454545 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186153533072 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661549130414 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424346122293 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112412332362 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335776353478 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.