The graphs show the percentage of the population of a computer ownership between 2002 and 2010 and a computer ownership by education level by the year 2002 and 2010.
The first graph, the percentage of computer ownership without education was the lowest by 58% in 2002. The percentage of computer ownership was slightly grown 80% in 2004. Moreover, computer ownership was rising 68% and 75% between 2006 and 2008. In 2010, computer ownership was the highest percentage of 80%.
The second graph, The percentage of computer ownership by education level in 2010 the highest proportion was a postgraduate by 90%. Moreover, the percentage of computer ownership by education level was college (incomplete) by 80% in 2010. In 2002, a high school graduate by 35% and bachelor's degree by 55%. On the other hand, the lowest percentage of computer ownership by education level was no high school diploma by 15% in 2002
To conclusion, the percentage of both computer ownership without education and the proportion of computer ownership by educating level was rising in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graphs show the percentage of the po...
^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ducation was the lowest by 58% in 2002. The percentage of computer ownership was sl...
^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eover, computer ownership was rising 68% and 75% between 2006 and 2008. In 2010, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18390804598 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84718931341 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 63.0 106.607317073 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.362068965517 0.547539520022 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.2315429682 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3527984002 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2089227566 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124642903648 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310512009306 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114532754686 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.12 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.