Some countries around the globe implement the policy to cover the increasing education expense for children by their national treasures. While there are some disadvantages to this policy, I believe that it is generally more beneficial in various ways.
On the one hand, there are several drawbacks to provide free or partial free education for all children of a whole country. One of the primary concerns is that it would make up a significant share of the national budget to subsidize the tuition fees for a nation’s children. As a result, the spending for other equally pressing issues such as environment or national defense would be cut down. Secondly, it is likely that this practice would lead to a heavy dependence of the nation’s citizens to their government. Without having to pay for their children’s tuition fees, parents may not actively engage in children’s educational pursuit, owing to the fact that they may tend to think that the government should take the ultimate responsibility.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons that I believe this policy should be more strongly advocated. Firstly, it is unquestionable that education is essential to the development of a country. Investing in children is always highly beneficial as they will be the future contributors to a society. Furthermore, in some developing countries, there are a considerable number of parents who are unable to afford their children’s education. Yet these countries are desperately in need of skilled workers to build up the nations as well as to solve various social problems. Therefore, giving free access to education for young people is a method to lift the residents out of poverty, gradually progressing toward prosperity.
In conclusion, it seems to me that having children’s education cost covered by national budgets offers more advantages for the governments and citizens who adopt this change.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25974025974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04183874184 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5365822021 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236078988039 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749723523008 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683695536387 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159958289472 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640124013707 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.