Although handicapped people are often subjected to sympathy of abled citizens, they are highly unlikely to have similar opportunities as others. In order to increase their social states, authorities can improve their health conditions and make them take part in country’s workforce as well.
Firstly, government needs to identify their individual in capabilities, and then should find out possible solutions with the involvement of health care workers. As different people have different limitations and different skills, clinics should be organized to assess them individually, and they thereafter can be provided with tailor made programs to enhance their wellbeing. For example, hemiplegic patients with mild to moderate upper limb weaknesses would be able to perform most of their day today tasks if they are provided with and trained to use variety of simple orthoses and prostheses. Likewise, hearing aids are capable of improving the quality of life of people with hearing difficulty to a large extent. Therefore this approach offers them a feeling of validity and ability to do particular things that they were not able to do earlier.
In addition, in cooperating disabled people in country’s labor force would alter the way other people look at them, and certainly the gap between two parties will reduce. Were they to assign duties according to their weaknesses and abilities, they would contribute to boost country’s economy. Not only does it help to grow economy, but will also build their self-esteem and enhance the way they live. This is supported by a recent study conducted at Colombo University in which they claim that when handicapped youths engage in work, the chance of developing psychological diseases such as anxiety and depression drops by 90%.
In conclusion, rulers can take actions to offer disabled citizens a higher quality life rather than only to act sympathetically. Two prime suggestions are to find solutions for their health related problems and to employ them in suitable work places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...h hearing difficulty to a large extent. Therefore this approach offers them a feeling of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, likewise, look, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38125 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85092501436 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2836747338 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.461538462 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204160108581 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067273722167 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398122406736 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119027207556 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527894623457 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.