At present time, the loss of many languages has become a serious problem in many parts of the world. Many hold a belief that It would be more comfortable if fewer languages are used. However, from my perspective, the maintenance of language is crucial for the following reasons.
First, it is noteworthy that the presence of many languages boosts the means of communication more variable and more effectively. The counter argument raised by opponent is that contacting by different languages, which share a similar grammar structure or vocabulary, may causes misunderstanding between both sides. This justification may true to some extent; however, it should be acknowledged that beside communicating by mother tongue with family and friends, one can use English, the global language, for official and international conversations. America could be cited as a good example. Having immigrants from parts of the world, it's community maintained by distinguishing languages, building the most worth- visited country for visitors and exchange students because of the diversified culture and the communication ability of locals.
Secondly, preserving lingual sector means protecting the origin and culture of such nations. In fact, all of the traditions such as: clothes, conventional festivals, local food are invented and conserved through the region's mother tongue. Nowadays westernization is widening the gap between the young generation, most of whom trying to acquire popular languages, and their first language. Therefore, it is necessary to take care of the existence of languages, especially the rare one. Vietnam, for example, is a successful story in this situation. Although many people take English as the formal language in work place, they still give priority to Vietnamese in daily life and enjoy traditional culture.
In conclusion, under no circumstances should people give low weight to the variety of languages for reasons as mentioned below.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...ous problem in many parts of the world. Many hold a belief that It would be more comforta...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...n and culture of such nations. In fact, all of the traditions such as: clothes, convention...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57190635452 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12314060296 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645484949833 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.989121769 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.066666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167381532719 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496432451295 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423293812735 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970913669816 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295325737415 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.