In the past twenty years, the amount of traffic on the road has greatly increased, and this has led to many problems with traffic jams and pollution in inner city areas. Recently, some people argued that it is valid to control this situation by increasing the price of petrol. As far as I am concerned, it might not be the effective way for those problems and other measures should be introduced.
A higher price of petrol cannot solve the frequent use of cars or other private vehicles, which is the main reason for the traffic congestion and air pollution. Firstly, comparing the price of a car, the price of petrol is by far less, so that people who own a private car would not give up their cars to commute by public services. Secondly, the prices of buses’ tickets are likely to increase with the soaring prices of petrol which would make it difficult to afford for some destitute citizens, and finally it might lead to a bad side effect.
There are several approaches, which is need the effort of both government and individuals, might make it more effective to solve the problems. Government fund should spend to improve the services of public transportation. In addition, citizens should be educated to aware of the negative effects of driving private vehicles as well as the consequences of air pollution. Meanwhile, those effects should be added in a textbook to teach teenagers, which are of benefits to the future situation.
Overall, increasing the price of petrol may have some advantages, but, on a whole, it is not the best way to address those problems. Government policy and education for citizens might play a vital role in solving those problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86411149826 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69546822134 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529616724739 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5500987991 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242159907692 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887901068524 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475160855316 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148458384514 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383652072397 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.