Nowadays, in this competitive and complicated world with wide variety of technological developments, majority of people prefer to watch movies in their home instead of going cinemas. There are significant debates between social researchers about most prominent causes for this phenomenon.
Some social experts are unanimous in effects of distributing social media and internet which led to declining movie watchers in cinema. Several years ago and before expanding some technologies on computer`s software and TV, cinema was so attractive and fantastic for people. Majority of people distinguished their dates on cinema to fabricate Best moments for their partners there and enjoy movies simultaneously and the opening nights of movies in cinema was very crowded. As time went on, the rapidness of technological improvements in computers and internet increased sharply. Numerous updated software created and people could download their favorite movies in their home. Furthermore, the number of movies on cinema restricted for people but they can achieve their favorite movies on the internet rapidly.
On the other aspect, by pursuing this pattern lots of cinema`s beneficiaries forced to close their cinemas because the cost of cinema for them increased and on the other hand their income diminished strongly. Recent published reports in U.K. illustrated that more than 1 forth of cinemas in this country have been closed during recent decade. Some movie producers believe that governments and legal authorities should implement some strict laws for illegal movie publishers to avoid distributing their movies as soon as their legal time. They insist that this publishing method caused to declining people`s motivation to watch movies in the cinema.
In conclusion, by continuing this pattern in technology the number of people who see movies in cinema will decrease undoubtedly. In my point of view, governments should devise some appropriate plans to revive this tendency because I believe that we should encourage movie producers to make new films eagerly. I think current trend will have detrimental effects for cinema industry in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivation to watch movies in the cinema. In conclusion, by continuing this patter...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5896656535 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92606200542 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565349544073 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1254392947 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199821460114 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786494115598 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411293826103 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123486926482 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043154163472 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.