Nowadays, an increasing concern for myriads of nations in the world is that thousands of graduates who are well-educated with great qualifications but still do not have any occupations. There are several explanations for this phenomenon and also some possible measurements can be done to tackle it.
There are two main factors that have caused this situation which is the lack of experiences and inappropriate behaviors. Firstly, most of these highly qualified graduates do not have many essential practical skills needed to support their academic knowledge. An unwanted fact is that many educational institutions including universities do not concentrate on instructing empirical applications for students but only focus on tedious concepts and theories. Besides, the belief that perfect qualification will impact greatly on the future career also makes students get involved more on studying knowledge needed for the exams and forget that they need to find out how to practice this knowledge in real life. As a result, more and more graduates are lacking hands-on experiences mostly required for employment. Secondly, many students graduate from universities with distinguished degrees as well as practical skills but have bad behaviors when applying for a job. For example, some graduates from Foreign Trade University in Vietnam frequently request a high wage because of their qualified background, which annoys many employers, hence, these vanity people are left unemployed.
One feasible solution for this problem is for schools to adjust their curriculums by adding more subject-practice activities and encouraging students to participate. Accordingly, they should construct or extend the scale of laboratories and give students more access to research devices. In classrooms, teachers should ask more thought-provoking and life-related questions and give their students time or hints to find a particular answer. Another rational solution is for parents who are close to their children to edify them about working environments where require empirical skills to survive.
In conclusion, there are two main factors that raise the unemployment issue for graduates with respectful qualifications, and to handle this we need the efforts of both educators and parents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66862170088 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16574042465 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604105571848 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2137286419 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.071428571 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176226827523 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666355398083 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502214902269 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972312869262 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509165056153 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.