In today's world the food items that we consume plays a vital role in maintaining our health. The intake of certain diet decides our level in terms of fitness. It is necessary for a person to consume a good balance diet.
In a quick moving world we care less about the things that we are eating. The beverages and packed food items that we consume acts differently than the fresh home cooked meal. In addition to this the level of sugar that we intake in form of drinks effect our health.
The industry based packed items and drinks are easily available but we neglect the issues let out by these items. Sugar level in these items are literally high. People consume these items and never care about the deteriorating health.
It is important for the people to be aware of the consequences of these artificial sugar items. It should be brought into the lights of common group of people consuming these beverages and drinks. We cannot increase the price of certain items to stop the customers to possess it. Instead we can arrange an awareness programme about these deadly sugar products. The awareness programme can help people understand the value of their good health and decide what to consume there after.
Thus I would conclude my statement saying increasing the price items cannot stop people from taking sugar items. Instead it should be dealt wisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ms to stop the customers to possess it. Instead we can arrange an awareness programme a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 471, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: thereafter
... good health and decide what to consume there after. Thus I would conclude my statement...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...decide what to consume there after. Thus I would conclude my statement saying in...
^^^^
Line 9, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ot stop people from taking sugar items. Instead it should be dealt wisely.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82553191489 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32394974502 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523404255319 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5848700177 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.875 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6875 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185647148331 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072309182676 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453874430162 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109076954525 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179851160999 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.