Technological advancement in undertaking work is preferred to the use of human labor. In my opinion, I think that this trend is more beneficial in the working area as time is saved and accuracy attained.
There are several reasons why I would argue that robotics employed in the workforce is very important. Machinery used at work saves time, because they are able to undertake huge tasks within the shortest possible time. Take for example, in the manufacture of cement industry, there are numerous equipment used to either fetch raw materials or mix them up to get the final product. With the aid of the machines such tasks are duly accomplished in a relatively short while. Eventually, a higher productivity is achieved which helps to boost the financial standing of the organization.
Another point worth noting with the use of advanced technology in working is that they have optimal precision or accuracy. A robot known as The Da Vinci is used in most developed countries such as China to perform surgeries such as hernia repair and it is believed to be hundred percent accurate with its incision. This simply means that untoward incidents likely to occur after surgery are greatly eliminated or reduced to the barest minimum. Furthermore, robots are used in various banking halls to count colossal amount of money with varied currencies. These machines are able to do so without any recordable errors, thus preventing any possible loss from the bank.
In conclusion, I agree that modernization in technology ought to be employed in the work area for accurate delivery and saving time
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... hernia repair and it is believed to be hundred percent accurate with its incision. Thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea for accurate delivery and saving time
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06060606061 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8014737693 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2053336226 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.769230769 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115333014295 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040289855479 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387478340704 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817409180186 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381477191802 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.