It is argued by some people that the budget spent on space exploration should be allocated to address urgent issues like poverty, education or worldwide crises regardless of the enormous benefits that space research has brought to human beings. However, I personally disagree with this judgement.
People do not conduct space research merely for contenting curiosity, those studies are extremely precious from scientific and economic perspectives. Space exploration has broadened our horizons about the universe, origin of our Earth and the solar system. This valuable knowledge directly benefits in creating technology breakthroughs. Utilization deprived from accomplishments outside the Earth are not ambiguous to the general population, by contrast these are much more familiar to us. Take meteorology for example, weather forecast was no longer an arduous task like before with the worthwhile support from the weather satellite system. A more obvious evidence of the vital role of space research is the Global positioning system (GPS) which is fundamentally based on artificial satellite systems. Pilots will be likely to confront a ton of hardship to navigate a plane, as well as taxi drivers tend to be troublesome to reach the destinations, without GPS.
However, in fact, pouring money into space does not mean the concern about other crucial problems is sinking into oblivion. Only a small number of countries have space research programmes. In other words, governments of the majority nations still concentrate the vast money and resources to cope with poorness, environment pollution and illiteracy. Even predominant countries in space affairs, the money that they invest in space missions only takes up a few percentages of their national budget. In addition, inventions involving space studies also help to solve global realistic puzzles to some extent. To be specific, satellite internet has provided a working platform for outsourced jobs in developing countries, contributing to a significant decreased unemployment rate in these countries.
In conclusion, space research is undeniably beneficial, thus should be financially encouraged to develop beside other priorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...problems is sinking into oblivion. Only a small number of countries have space research programme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69207317073 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03439134912 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646341463415 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3667024248 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6875 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225185846871 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632877645153 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523111553195 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136589393111 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035513703791 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.