It is observed that many employers give money to employees for their better performance, however, this is a good practise in business, many believe that it impacts negatively on others. In my perception this way of management is highly effective. My viewpoints and other alternatives to encourage workers are elaborated below.
To start with, it cannot be denied that workers are work for money. It is true that human being required sufficient money to sustain and fulfil their dreams. Give money as an incentive could encourage the citizens to work more hardly. For example, Apple company give their workers 1000$ as a gift, if they finish the task within a time limit. In result, the company's revenue surged by 20% and productivity of employees also hiked. Moreover, such a practise should motivate the workers to work hard, who did not benefited by the scheme.
On the other side, other parameters to encourage workers for better productivity cannot be ignored. Despite giving money on hand to workers, companies should provide other benefits. Such as health insurance, free accommodation, foreign tour. These alternative advantages should be beneficial for the better life style of employees as well as for organisations. Besides this, top productive employees should rewarded with hiked salary and less workload. Microsoft in Japan, for example, allowed their top performers with less working hours.
All in all, it can be eventually commented that employees should be appricieted by their boss, rewarding money is the best way to appriciate workers. While this style of management could dissatisfy some workers, I believe that it is beneficial for companies and employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...uld encourage the citizens to work more hardly. For example, Apple company give their ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1000'.
Suggestion: $1000
...ample, Apple company give their workers 1000$ as a gift, if they finish the task with...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, as for, for example, such as, as well as, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32209737828 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83866471531 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569288389513 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3576312572 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5882352941 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143165293071 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482755484529 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438688947679 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929381681737 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03777715252 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.