People hold different views about whether scientific research ought to be deviled and monitored by the authority of private companies. Although private organizations are still needed, I believe governments' role is irreplaceable.
Businesses which are hold by individuals have been having crucial contributions to scientific achievements. As not being controlled, they own the freedom to develop creative projects and proved themselves as drivers of innovation. Additionally, it is their advantage to be able to receive ample financial resources allowing breakthroughs outstanding innovations funded by restrictive state policies. To prove this, it is a private sector who gave birth to the most prevailing covid 19 vaccine in Vietnam.
However, the credibility of most citizens lies with the government when it comes to the social welfare domain. If the outputs of vaccine or infectious disease cure or others in regard to health, the states' work would be more trustworthy. In contrast, the outcomes of profit-oriented businesses are often being suspended when profit purposes get involved and possible to distort research results for their own benefits. For example in Vietnam, some pharmaceutical companies produce low-quality vaccines or fake their effectiveness when provide for the national immunization program for children. This leads to the death of many youngsters and resistant depression.
In conclusion, it is clear that both public and private sectors have equally important roles in scientific research. Nevertheless, the governments' responsibility is more fundamental as their works are more reliable. Furthermore, they should collaborate with private companies so that there are no waste of ingenious resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...ed themselves as drivers of innovation. Additionally it is their advantage to be able to rec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...revailing covid 19 vaccine in Vietnam. However the credibility of most citizens lies w...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... scientific research. Nevertheless, the governments responsibility is more fundamental as t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79921259843 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29650773303 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665354330709 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1435943556 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187756012512 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588137433341 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429192888159 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121820797632 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521322144462 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.