There are lots of employers, who are encouraging their staff for individual achievements, some of them pay for this extra money. This essay will first discuss which positive effect has this type of management, and it will then address the question of another ways of stimulation workers.
To begin with, money plays one of the principal roles in modern society. From this point, it is not a secret that everybody wants to earn more. On this side, rewarding style of management is effective, because it is the way of increasing level of productivity. In case the workers work harder, additional income will brought to the company. However, some people prefer to go home early, than take extra work, even though it will be good payment, and this situation it should be found another type of management.
Sometimes staffs do not have enough time for entertainment or spending time with their families. From this point of view, one of the best way of encouraging is give additional vacation or more free time holiday for their exceptional contribution. Another type of stimulation may be introducing «the best workers of the month». This kind of encouraging is widely used in the big international companies, which want to rise of efficiency. But it also can effect on the one group of workers, which are the most productively.
In conclusion, nowadays, there exist lots of rewarding forms for personal contributions for the companies. They should be chosen in individual way, for each person and each company by employers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...ers work harder, additional income will brought to the company. However, some people pr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, so, then, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05928853755 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88172382495 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5792653493 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4285714286 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309883147659 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968482585942 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809044510397 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182477043464 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476393403097 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.