Quite a few people think that knowledge should be distributed freely between certain fields such as science, industry, and education. Others, however, contest that specific types of information are too significant and should be withheld. This essay will discuss why information should be protected in certain situations but why the availability of information is ultimately more beneficial.
Revealing information in special circumstances could prove detrimental to a business or even an entire nation. For example, data relating to a product in development or a prototype is of high significance. Rival companies looking to make a profit may steal selected aspects of the design or imitate the product entirely. Similarly, details regarding a country gathered by intelligence agencies are far too valuable to be open to the public. If this kind of information was easily accessible, hostile organizations or governments may use this to their advantage and possibly attack or invade. Thus, it is understandable why some people believe that certain types of information must be classified.
However, there are some benefits to sharing intelligence between certain fields. For instance, easily accessible knowledge in the field of medical research could lead to rapid breakthroughs in many seemingly incurable diseases. Additionally, law firms that cooperate and allow the free exchange of data are more likely to succeed in obtaining justice or compensation for their clients. Increased knowledge can lead to fewer misconceptions and greater understanding between human beings, which not only benefits one on an abstract level but may also influence humanity en masse. This is arguably more significant than maintaining secrets to protect one's business.
In conclusion, the free availability of information has both its rewards and ramifications. This essay discussed why information is concealed but why sharing knowledge is more advantageous to mankind. In my opinion, sharing information freely is necessary if we are to advance as a species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ant than maintaining secrets to protect ones business. In conclusion, the free av...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, regarding, similarly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65372168285 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25885307667 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598705501618 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0644060662 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.764705882 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232830577835 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721998328679 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643996856342 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140148204852 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559802285114 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.