With the advent of technology, recycling industry has turned into a profitable realm of economy. It is argued that the participation rate of people to develop it as an ultimate goal is inadequate and cannot be spontaneously increased. I agree that the most reliable form of people’s persuasiveness to get involved in this project is through legislation and I will explain why.
On the one hand, despite all informative measures, people have not been induced to do their share because in my opinion, the necessity and merit features of recycling are more complicated to be understood by ordinary people. When citizens do not have a comprehensive perception of this scheme, they underestimate their active roles to take even tiny steps such as using several rubbish bins to separate waste at their homes. Furthermore, domestic refuse segregation is a time-consuming task and for many families who are reluctant to be responsible society members is not a preferred job to do.
On the other hand, throwaway society should be managed by stringent rules and could not be left on its own members’ desires. On the societal level, it was shown that people do not bother themselves due to environmental or economic grounds of where they inhabit, however, from a political perspective converting waste to reusable objects is what can preserve countries’ energy resources as well as raw materials; as a result, what government should do is taking steps to force dwellers to follow some predetermined regulations which might lead to them participating within this plan more conscientiously. People have to appreciate that they will penalize at least by fining if they act negligently against their duty. Experience shows that people in many cases abide by a law due to the fear of punishment or fine. For example, after installing cameras at highways the rate of speeding has significantly decreased. In essence, video surveillance sends a message to lawbreakers that if they violate the traffic rules they run the risk of being punished. I believe that we all learn from conditioning. If we need, therefore, to see eagerly cooperation of citizens in this project, we should trigger the first steps by imposing stricter supervision and then we would be witness of flourishing recycling approach in the years ahead.
In conclusion, although household waste segregation might seem a personal choice which can be reinforced by advertising or other soft informative options, I personally feel that people do not spend their time and energy on it where governments are too lenient to foster the pre-mentioned approach in the absence of proper laws.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in many cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2224824356 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1695398422 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59718969555 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.988175441 49.4020404114 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4666666667 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9333333333 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228853118008 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065487348853 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414231391644 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12802900694 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404799753625 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.