In this fast paced life, introduction of mobile phones has made our life most comfortable by producing a vast range of opportunities for seeking and solving information. Some individuals insisted that prohibition on cell phones need to be implemented in public spots which include libraries, shops and public transport. I disagree with the view point and my disagreement will be discussed in forthcoming paragraphs before writing personal conclusion.
To start with, the usage of mobile phones in public places has not yet been became responsible for any mishappening due to the several positive factors behind it. The pivotal reason beyond this is that in case of any misbehaviour in shops and while transporting, having the opportunity to seek prompt action by informing police and people create security in people's mind with the help of mobile. For example, in India, public transportation is not well systematic through which the chances of violence increasing by leaps and bounds. These sorts of circumstances always demands instant actions which only can expected with cell phones. Therefore, sanctions on mobiles in public places can pave the ways for calling worst situation.
Moving further, the another worth mentioning positive of mobile phones is that in libraries people can use different kind of dictionary and learning apps on mobile phones while reading and this always helps to get knowledge in an accurate way. For instance, according to a survey most of the college going students use their mobile phones in libraries due to the accuracy in information these phones provide. Hence, it can be said that half of the knowledge comes from the phones itself, which eventually making students and common people brilliants in learning.
The appropriate conclusion that can be drawn by analysing the above discussion is that there is no desperate need seemed which demands ban on phones. Fortunately, the usage of phones in public places emerging fruitfully as it plays important role in determining the distinct situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...hones in public places has not yet been became responsible for any mishappening due to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'calling the worst'.
Suggestion: calling the worst
... in public places can pave the ways for calling worst situation. Moving further, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ways for calling worst situation. Moving further, the another worth mentio...
^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an accurate way" with adverb for "accurate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and this always helps to get knowledge in an accurate way. For instance, according to a survey mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34365325077 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87998259773 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59133126935 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.04320137 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.769230769 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314593022762 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106298914455 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06833505072 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181952844788 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326196562025 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.