Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree

In this day and age, a majority of people believe that producing newspapers is not essential. I partially agree with this view that access to the Internet is not widely available all over the world.
On the one hand, I agree with the point that printed newspapers necessary because they are the most common form of accessing information among the elderly and people with eyes impairment. It is clear that most old people are not interested in reading on electronic devices. First of all, the elderly don’t like looking at the telephone screens for a long time, because they can have a headache and lose memory. Instead, they use newspapers and magazines to receive sources of new information. In addition, severe myopia is not allowed to contact with the radiation of blue light from the screen for too long time because it is harmful to the eyes as well as easy to be visual impairment. To remedy that situation, they prioritize reading books and newspapers to reduce eye habitation and practice perseverance. For example, a girl - Mafia, watched cartoons on her phone too much in a day, which caused her to lose one eye and have to be treated in the hospital from May to now.
On the other hand, I also support the view that newspapers are not as important to get information in our 4.0 world where there are new media and the internet since paper-based articles take a long time to edit and publish, so updating the new information on social media is the best way to provide the exact and fastly information for everyone. Moreover, people only spend a few minutes accessing the Internet to receive up-to-the-minute information instead of obtaining current news in newspapers. For instance, when Covid - 19 broke out, the information about the occurrence and its consequence on almost social networking such as TV and the Internet.
In conclusion, both views have different strengths and weaknesses points, but I completely agree with bringing up-to- date on social media thanks to updating quickly and saving
nature materials.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 833, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tice perseverance. For example, a girl - Mafia, watched cartoons on her phone too...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9387755102 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78616017322 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553935860058 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1349431497 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.307692308 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094768884791 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376450113654 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356425018351 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577142064507 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237946927526 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.