Some people argue that governmental funding for education should mainly focus on science-based subjects instead of other fields in order to enhance a country’s development. While I agree that renovations in science and technology can bring about substantial benefits, investing equally in other subjects is crucial to a nation’s growth.
On the one hand, it is true that scientific and technological developments benefit a country in many ways. From an economic perspective, advanced technology offers essential facilities and infrastructure for use in the construction industry, the energy industry and many other fields. For example, a country with technological advancements are capable of providing its energy industry with productive machines for exploiting natural resources, giving the industry the opportunities to grow. Also, if a country experienced scientific and technological progress, its citizens will be granted with satisfactory social services. For instance, that fact that developed countries such as the UK and the US are well-known for having outstanding healthcare systems is due to their developments in science and technology.
On other other hand, encouraging students to pursue studies in other areas is vital to a country’s progress. Firstly, a nation required leaders and authorities to function normally. Since governers and politicians often pursue education in other fields such as politics, philosophy, law in their young age, investing solely on science-based fields may result in lacks of administrators in the future. Secondly, arts, literature and other fields of humanities contribute considerably to cultural richness of a nation. If a country is only developed in terms of its economy without enriching its citizens’ cultural life, such progress has no meaning as it does not make people happier. In other words, abandoning other fields means dismissing important aspects of human life.
In conclusion, I disagree with the view that government should invest mostly on fields of studies that are science-based, because I believe that other fields are important in equal measure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
...pments in science and technology. On other other hand, encouraging students to pursue st...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77602523659 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32669548427 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580441640379 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2052263971 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.785714286 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298759974532 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990033417191 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600763902643 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185083827462 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043440585029 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.