Some people argue that the role of government in medical services sector cannot be replaced by individual proprietorships. Despite some obvious drawbacks in this issue, there are also several benefits which are worth considering.
The most apparent advantage gained from the privatization in health care industries is that individual firms contribute significantly to improve the quality of services. That is because, firstly, they share pressure from the overload of public hospitals, which sometimes encounter difficulties to provide comfort amenities for their patients at peak times. Secondly, they also put their capital to ameliorate medical equipment and infrastructure. Besides, thanks a large part to the participation of private investors, healthcare industries are more and more diversified. In other words, civilians have more chance to opt for doctors as well as facilities which they expect or can afford. For instance, in recent years, the appearance of private luxurious hospitals such as Vinmec or Viet-France hospital adapts growing demand of many high-income people who are willing to pay more money for shorter wait times and advanced services. Therefore, the involvement of private investors in the healthcare sector is indispensable.
However, there are also some downsides to take into consideration before permit individual companies to take part in this sector. The privatization probably makes civilians have to pay more money for their healthcare services instead of receiving benefit from the free-for-service system in case the government totally takes control of public sanitation. To make matters worse, the privatization of medical services is one of the causes leading to the inequality. Due to profit incentive, private health facilities probably concentrate only on high-income customers ignoring low-income patients or providing poor quality for them. Consequently, this evident discrimination causes negative feedback from the community.
In conclusion, medical care is one of the minimum requirements which need to be taken for granted in each nation. Although private investment in this service sector seems to cause some negative social impacts like the increase in expense for healthcare services and the growing in the rich-poor gap, its outstanding contribution to make immense progress in this domain would be well recognized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
... that the role of government in medical services sector cannot be replaced by individual...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79202279202 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14530946776 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2952877644 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0625 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190207778557 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595620908852 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474683797285 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116001273167 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00991362980022 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.