Recently, the phenomenon of an insatiable desire for higher professional and social status as well as its corresponding impacts has sparked a hot-running pervasive debate among different groups, specifically employers and employees. In this regard, whereas some believe, the only road to career achievement and financial security is sticking to a permanent job, others are the opinion of change their career path, environment, or even both. In my mind, the benefits of experiencing a variety of workspaces and professional tasks can overweigh its demerits through the following compelling reasons.
On the one hand, the group, who believes in changing their job, are the ones that have a series of common characteristics, including but not limited to ambitious, open-minded, high-risk aversion. However, their insatiable desire for power plays the most significant role in between. Related to the aforementioned reason, recent scholarly findings indicate that approximately 87% of people with a higher desire for social status have the highest tendency to signal conspicuously their status through their career position. Moreover, they are firmly convinced, changing their professional activities and creating a larger professional circle will assist them to move forward at a sharper pace. Furthermore, there is not only their employees’ propensity to work for a while, but also the role of employers cannot be overlooked. To give an instance, long-term contracts impose prohibitive costs to the business owners, such as insurance, pension, so on and so forth, while short-terms have fewer financial burdens and legal issues.
On the other hand, old fashion, narrow-minded, and family-oriented, are the ones who have less inclination to do job-hunting. Pertinent to this type of characteristics, psychological research depicts that in contrast with the first group they enjoy a high level of doing routine, being stuck in a rut, and feeling financially safe. Furthermore, this attitude is more prevalent among the sole- breadwinners with the lower level of putting their family in financial trouble, thereby working in a permanent position would be their first and best choice.
To sum up, despite the convincing reasons of both sides of the arguments that its demerits cannot be underestimated, I opt to vigorously support the idea of being open to change career over the years of professional activities, since it creates a precious chance to learn and meet more people who are masters in their profession. Therefore, its drawbacks will not eclipse the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n would be their first and best choice. To sum up, despite the convincing reason...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...us chance to learn and meet more people who are masters in their profession. Therefore,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in contrast, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52911392405 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19284571187 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5509241875 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2142857143 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149490282045 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499104489224 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05657621448 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868274704394 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261427231733 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.