With the development of technology in recent years, many people thinks that study on the internet can full fill what students need, whereas other argues that students from the teacher still the most effective method of learning. In my opinion, i think that study online is good but learning through the traditional method is far better.
First and foremost, we must acknowledge the advantages of study online, it provides us wide range of materials, which can be very difficult to find in library and it is all free of charge, it make you save your time as well as money, every things that you need to do is preview and choose the best options that is suitable for your study. Furthermore, there is one things, i believe that is its most effective side is that you can learn from everywhere at any times, if you are a mobile people who do not want a repeated daily life , it will be the best choice, study when other is relaxing and realx when other studying. What is more, you can just focus on what you really need to study, such as, if you want to become a doctor, you do not have to study history, geography,.. it is not related to your future job.
On the other hand, there are just 2 reasons but it make study with teacher become elite, firstly, there will be a dedicated teacher who ready to guide you on your path, they can teach you not only what to study but also how to study effectively. In some cases, it is understandable to see a teacher spend whole their days off to get students through. More importantly, they are the people who can motivate you to be the better version of yourself, when study online you can be distracted because of many reasons, but when there is a people who can punish you whenever you are lazy, it is another story.
We can conclude that learning from Tv or internet can be considered as a bonus, it can rival to traditional methods of learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tive method of learning. In my opinion, i think that study online is good but lea...
^
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng through the traditional method is far better. First and foremost, we must a...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...ibrary and it is all free of charge, it make you save your time as well as money, ev...
^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one thing', 'a thing', or simply 'things'?
Suggestion: one thing; a thing; things
...e for your study. Furthermore, there is one things, i believe that is its most effective s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tudy. Furthermore, there is one things, i believe that is its most effective side...
^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le who do not want a repeated daily life , it will be the best choice, study when ...
^^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... do not have to study history, geography,.. it is not related to your future job. ...
^^
Line 3, column 775, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...do not have to study history, geography,.. it is not related to your future job. ...
^^
Line 3, column 778, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...not have to study history, geography,.. it is not related to your future job. O...
^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...r hand, there are just 2 reasons but it make study with teacher become elite, firstl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, really, so, still, well, whereas, i think, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in some cases, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48414985591 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42615880187 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512968299712 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.0913425363 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.6 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.7 20.7667163134 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.9 7.06120827912 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244721851217 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103305334685 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588496274592 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148390832537 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550129177708 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.