Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

It is a common belief that learning in person in classrooms bring more benefits than learning via the internet and social networks at home. Although there are both advantages and disadvantages of online learning, I suppose that this modern study method will provoke more drawbacks for the long-term result. In other words, I totally agree with the statement.
On the positive side, online learning does have some noticeable prospects. Firstly, to the students themselves, engaging in distance learning means they have a more flexible schedule. They do not have to commute to school as normal so they could have more time to relax. This lead to the second benefits which is associated with the environment. That said the fewer people use vehicles on the roads means the less severe street pollution as well as traffic congestions. Take Vietnam for example, in the 4 months in early 2021, the fourth wave of COVID pandemic has forced students to stay and study at home, therefore, the air pollution level immediately tumbled as a great result.
However, distance learning has many negative effects on the students which should be seriously considered. Firstly, studying online means a lack of social interaction between students and teachers or students and students. Consequently, less peer support plus a substantial amount of knowledge and homework can easily exhaust all students. Secondly, despite smartphones, laptops or computers are much affordable nowadays, some parents still do not have the efficient financial ability to provide for their children. In the long run, distance learning gradually deprives these students of the right of pursuing knowledge.
In conclusion, the truth is learning from home via social networks contains many pros and cons. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that the traditional learning method gives greater opportunities for all students regardless of their family financial condition.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...id the fewer people use vehicles on the roads means the less severe street pollution ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as for, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42333333333 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81436592425 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0433745415 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232993325107 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692380088734 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389436907098 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141467149885 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03591232295 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.