It is thought by some that it s better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside Discuss both views and give your own opinion

In recent times, there has been ongoing debate related to positives being live in metropolitan areas. Some people say that it make more sense to stay in City centre compared to remote areas, whilst others do not. Although this development has few drawbacks, I agree to large extent with those who believe towns are more beneficial.

The chief advantage to make is that the quality of life is way heigher than the countryside. The lots of facilities such as education and healthcare are way more developed and easy to get. The majority of modern and international schools, university as well as specialised hospitals are located in the city centre. Moreover, it has developed road and transport system. By using public transport individuals easly commute one place to another. Above all it convinient, relatively cheap and time saving.

In addition, there are plenty of employment opportunities available. The head officers of big companies are commonly located in central business district of mega cities. That means, lots of jobs are available with handsome salary and greater financial insentives which offered by those firms. Apart from that, there are number of leisure activities such as cenema centers, malls, gardens and many more are in easy reach.

On the other hand, there are some negatives as well. First and foremost is the pollution levels. The cities like New Delhi in India and Beijing in China both cities of respective countries are most polluted. Secondly, the properties in city areas, are expensive. Due to high population density, cost of decent size dwellings are more.

In conclusion, it is true that in metropolitan areas, there are few drawbacks such as polluted environment and expensive house prices. However, the positives like, high standard of leaving, efficient public transport, more job opportunities and many more are outlook the downside.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...are way more developed and easy to get. The majority of modern and international sc...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26910299003 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76124307263 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624584717608 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6259285574 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.05 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.090773060249 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250527288456 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367504476727 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483538783989 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486956274 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.