Nowadays, the average amount of cars is growing, thus it is believed, that their quantity ought to be declined for the sake of reducing traffic and pollution by the restriction in ownership to one car per family. Although, I agree that traffic jams and pollution are important issues of our reality, I do not support the idea of restriction, as I think that there should be other ways of addressing the problem.
On the one hand, rapidly growing percentage of vehicles number is the main reason of traffic congestion magnification and as the consequence air pollution. This bad influence on the quality of society life and their health in particularly. For instance, every day people have to waste time in long lines of traffic jams during their travelling to a job and back. At the same time, pedestrians suffer from quality of air which is spoiling every time from exhausted fumes. That is why this issue should be solved by different ways including the decrease of total amount of cars.
On the other hand, Government should not resort to drastic measures, like restriction in possession of private property. Firstly, because it may be unconstitutional step to forbid individuals the ownership of vehicles. Secondly, there is no any alternative to possession of own car, because it is the most convenient and comfortable mean of transportation. And finally, there are wide ranges of measures that can be undertaken in order to mitigate the impact of the traffic congestion issue. For instance, construction of new overpasses, extension of existing roads. Moreover, the implementation of solar-powered car systems should be encouraged and subsided by the state. Thus, the ownership freedom cannot be compromised for environmental goals.
To conclude, though I agree that the whole amount of cars should be declined to prevent traffic congestion and pollution, I believe that other measures should be undertaken as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...nership of vehicles. Secondly, there is no any alternative to possession of own ca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16987179487 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06234359715 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6420727417 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34576267596 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970831356898 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863947985896 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218996512665 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988915758745 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.