Environmental protection has become the first priority for the human race to survive on this planet. Some believe that it is the responsibility of an individual to save the mother earth. However, I opine that government’s authority is the required for environment security.
I accede that contribution of a layman is necessary as the government cannot control what people could do in their home or garden. It is required for the people to understand the consequences of the danger they can cause to nature. People should think before purchasing any product. For example, if they want to purchase a refrigerator or air conditioner, cooling gasses being used needs to be considered, as these gasses play a primary role in the greenhouse effect. Similarly, people should travel moderately to reduce the air pollution. Thus, mankind should consider protection of the habitat on the earth as a moral duty.
However, the ministry can remind this moral duty of the human being in case they forget by enforcing stringent environment-friendly policies. Politicians have the power not only to ban the products which are not eco-friendly but also to increase the tax on traveling to reduce the air pollution. Also, the government should keep a close eye on factories to prevent them from polluting river, air or land. For instance, authorities could pass the bill for an inspection of a workshop before providing a licensee to ensure it does not cause any harmful impact on the surroundings. Thus, the authority is required more than willingness or morality of a person.
In conclusion, I believe that of course, it is virtuous for an individual to protect the environment, although politicians are more responsible for saving the planet because they have the power to enforce rules and regulations on the citizens.
Some people believe that
Some people believe that politiians should take more responsibility in the conservation of the environment than the individuals.
I believe that this is a collective responsibility by the society .This essay looks into some of the points which can bring forth a positive change to the environment.
It is an indisputable fact that more harm is done to the environment by urbanisation and insustrialisation.
Trees are cut down to make way for infrastructural developments and this reduces the fresh air supply and aides in pollution.
Governments can play an important role in this by excersing authority on stricter means of city planning.Builders should be advised to design and develop in a way that there is lesser harm to the environment.
Enforcing of stricter fines on industries releasing harmful emissions is another way of preserving nature.Politiians can take the pivotal role in passing ordinances in favour of these preservation acts.They can conduct environment awareness campaugns to educate the locals of their constituencies.
As mentioned earlier , individauls also need to participate in the protection of enviroment.Families can make an impact on the children , by teaching them the value of environment preservation.Kids can be encouraged to plant trees , reduce the usage of plastics etc .Schools should also engage children in activities like cleaning the beach, which can be made as activity filled group events.Mant countries has included environmental studies and conservations as a fundamental subjected in primary classes.This would help them understand and appreciate mother nature from a young age.
I will like to conclude my essay , by emphasing that young and old , citizens and politicies verybody should work together for the conservation and protection of the environment
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'of course']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243161094225 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.173252279635 0.155533422707 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0516717325228 0.0946595960268 55% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0455927051672 0.0501214627716 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0395136778116 0.0437548338989 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121580547112 0.122226691241 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0425531914894 0.0403226058552 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.16032572985 2.80594681477 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0425531914894 0.0326793684256 130% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136778115502 0.0861772015684 159% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0273556231003 0.021408717616 128% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00607902735562 0.011925033212 51% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1817.0 1933.35771543 94% => OK
No of words: 295.0 316.048096192 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1593220339 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383050847458 0.374742101984 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284745762712 0.28420135186 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.220338983051 0.203846283523 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159322033898 0.137316102897 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16032572985 2.80594681477 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.037074148 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.56093040696 101% => OK
Word variations: 59.6396710336 60.7387585426 98% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6666666667 20.7743622355 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9717253388 49.517814964 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.133333333 127.492653851 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7743622355 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 48.1412429379 49.1944974215 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.57647058824 1.69124875643 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351916985343 0.332605444948 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0960460853132 0.102741220458 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0484334061629 0.0668466124924 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546201300376 0.534860350844 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166376363482 0.148594505496 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139791873655 0.134430193775 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649701712895 0.0742795772207 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.455149858968 0.324371583561 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0434610132918 0.0638462369009 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253949437378 0.228012699653 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350911833547 0.058150111329 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.