It is a commonly held belief that old people need to live in particular communities such as nursing homes. However, some people do not have another choice to take care of their old parents, I admittedly, believe that they should live with their family owing to the following reasons.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that the elderly are teeming with life experiences. That is if juveniles use their experience and apply their advice they learn how to combat difficulties in life. A good illustration is parents that train children on how to face and manage tension and stress of financial problems and lay the foundation for taking rational and right decisions in the future. Simply put, aged people can transfer whatever they live to adults and deterrent them to do their mistakes which is a great help to their improving.
Yet another axiomatic argument is when starting their old age, people become more sensitive and require more attention like a child. To put it differently, The more once become old the more need gathering and especially being in their family and interact with them. Some large scale investigations show that the elderly have more risk to get psychological traumas such as extreme sadness, depression, and anxiety. A good illustration of this is old people who live in nursing homes. Most of them always feel lonely and wait for months or even years to visit their children just for one second. Furthermore, getting old is part of our life and no one can prevent this natural fact. Also, there is a myth that states if we leave our old parents in communities, our children do this with us.
In conclusion, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that aged people who live with their families have a more happy life. I also believe that curing old parents are one of our crucial duties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in their family and interact with them. Some large scale investigations show tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, in particular, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84423676012 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62875930462 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.49413956 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339374382274 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115354816159 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871144552403 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23857197318 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910632279846 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.