Possessing money to purchase must have products is undoubtedly one of the most prevailing and worrying aspects in any country. Some commentators would argue that money management should be a part of curriculum. I completely agree with this sentiment and this essay will explain causes briefly.
First of all, people will reap high economic benefits. It is obvious that people work from 9 a.m to 5 p.m to be able to survive in extremely demanding and competitive world. It is extremely important to balance income and spendings. For example, an article from CEO’s Diary New York in 2019 have revealed that 80% of billioners in USA graduated from business finance department of the world-renowned institutions. Seen in this light, when syllabus contains economics in secondary and primary schools, money will not be a crucial target to achieve.
Secondary, people will be able to socialise more. When people manage their income adequately, they will be able to share money for social and sports activities. Participating in such activities that improve intelligence of individuals are extremely affluent therefore it will be almost impossible for a family without dual income. To illustrate, a survey by Art Society Magazine revealed that 90% of Van Gogh Art Gallery visitors’ have at least a house. However, some analysts defend the idea that money must not be a major aim of teenagers and educational institutions should not force them have money-centred lifestyle. Given the strength of this evidence, it is totally unfounded to claim that learning money management has not clear benefits.
By way of conclusion, I would argue that ability of money management is one of the most essential life skill and, thus children should master it as early as possible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20350877193 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95298128877 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2400547138 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237727628112 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773161227988 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537602952642 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139059623768 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114257632089 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.